









So, when I was a kid I absolutely devoured the Mr. Men and Little Miss series by Roger Hargreaves. I read those books over and over again. There is something great about being a kid and having a brightly colored, unusually shaped identifier for a single trait. The characters were not complex mixtures of several personality factors. No, they completely embodied their name and attribute. Come to think of it, I liked Smurfs also. Once again, these little boogers mostly looked identical with a small prop to differentiate their personality, which their role revolved around. Poor "Swimmer Smurf" could only appear in the action if they were near water. What if he had something valuable to add in non-aquatic situations? The Smurf nation would never know.
While I greatly appreciate what these characters did for me in helping to understand these various traits, they may have had quite a detrimental effect on my development. Now, I say that tongue and cheek, but seriously, I wonder how it influenced my perception of individuals. I work in a world of "audience" or "consumer" segments. I have to observe how people act, categorize them and then predict future actions and behaviors. I have had to work VERY hard to break down the walls of stereotypes and assumptions about how people will react to a certain situation, and I think these characters played a bit of a role in building those barriers. Why can't Mr. Silly, be a bit smart now and then? Or, Mr. Happy can show concern over the war in Iraq? Oh sure, there were the occasional examples, but they were always extreme opposites, like Mr. Messy getting completely straightened out. It is kind of like the world of AA, you either drink and ruin lives because of your disease, or you go stone cold sober.
Anyway, above are my top 10 favorite Mr. Men of all-time: Starting with Mr. Tickle, Mr. Nonsense, Mr. Messy, Mr. Silly Mr. Strong, Mr. Happy, Mr. Jelly, Mr. Greedy, Mr. Bump and Mr. Impossible.




































