
Tomorrow I head to Sam's class to teach "my expertise." I am going to teach them about creative thinking skills. I have many exercises I use for this sort of thing, so I thought, "no problem."
Until I realized something. Many of our creative exercises involve getting adults to think like children again.
Fortunately, there is a bit of an objective. The students are writing a narrative (some sort of personal story). I am supposed to help them find their inner voice. hmmm.
Regarding creativity and children, I think there are a couple of things to hit upon:
1) Children are so often taught, "this is how you do something" ... obviously creativity has no such application.
2) Kids (especially in school) are often put in a place of working on their weaknesses ... whereas creativity is so much about using one's strengths.
3) Kids see rules as hampering their creativity. They live in a world of rules. This is the stage where we begin to suspect that a life without rules would be MORE creative: the "blue sky" idea. However, I'll rely on the quotes I learned about in
Ernie Schenck's Houdini Solution:
"Art lives on constraint and dies of freedom." - Michaelangelo
"When forced to work within a strict framework the imagination is taxed to its utmost – and will produce its richest ideas." - T. S. Eliot
We'll talk about how "rules" are what makes creativity possible.
4) Creativity is about useful originality. How do we get somewhere original? One of the best methods I have seen is
starting where people don't typically start from:
a) Pick the worst qualities of something, now describe them in an overwhelmingly positive manner. (That food is full of preservatives = that food will cook on the top of Everest during a zombie rampage; I'm bored = my mind has ample space to wander; The projector is broke = PowerPoint presentations suck anyway, finally I can just talk with you; I have too much work = I can focus on the stuff I enjoy doing most (the other stuff will always be around.))
I know, sounds like optimism tricks, but it also gets us looking at things from a different view ... if you are a pessimist by nature (use your strengths) than pick the positives and find the bad light to them (remember when "experience" was a positive word in politics?)
b) Take your subject and then bring it out to broader subjects. What fascinates me about the Golden Gate Bridge ... what about Bridges ... what about Orange ... what about Metal ... what about Connections ... what about Icons ... what about Tools .. what about a Gap ... what about Transcending a Gap? then brings those back to your original subject.
c) Replace a single element/variable. At the heart of experimentation and scientific discovery is this idea of switching a single variable to see the influence. This also works quite well in creative thinking. Sam is planning on writing his narrative on the
stick incident. What if he replaces pieces of his story? What if it is not him, but Wolverine ... what happens? What if it is not a stick, but an Olympic javelin? What if instead of happening at Golden Gate Park, it had happened at middle of nowhere Point Reyes? (This was something that Mary and I thought about afterwards ... this helped us realize how lucky we were, the advantage of the city, proximity ... all these elements that aren't part of the story until changed.)
Obviously, one of the other common elements of this exercise (part b of c) is to change perspective ... don't just tell your own story through your eyes ... tell it through different eyes. The place where people too often screw this up is that they focus on other major players: Mary, Cameron, the paramedic, the surgeon ... What about the paramedic's spouse hearing the story casually told at the dinner table, what about the dog walkers in the park who are clueless to the proceedings and the wonder of the mystery (
J.J. Abrams knows the power of this), the kids who saw Sam's scar days later, the person in the next ER room ...
Anyway, those are some of the things I am thinking about ... we'll see.